A friend passed along the following story with a cute punch line. It reminds me, however, of a more serious thought, one I spoke about at our seminar on Wednesday, Appraising In A Changing or Declining Market.
As licensee's what is expected of us from the public, the users of appraisal services and their investors, mortgage insurers or regulators? If you read and understand the Preamble to USPAP, the Ethics and the Competency Rules, along with the Mission Statement of your License Board, and the Appraisal Foundation; one is left with the feeling that a whole lot is expected and assumed about us and about our behavior, about what is contained in our reports.
Before I share the story, open your mind to the concept that there is an expectation that the public and users of appraisal services have about the truthfulness and reliability of our work. If we function as Advocates instead of Neutrals, that trust is violated.
If the market is going down and we say it is stable, we are violating that public trust. If the property is in Poor condition and we call it Average-Minus . . . .etc.
The kernel of the Socratic Method is one of questioning. I was first aware of it in a college course on Philosophy. It was made famous in the 1970's TV series The Paper Chase in which the crotchety old professor, played by John Housman, would ask one question after another of his student's, digging deeper, plying the depth of their knowledge, etc.
As licensees, the public, by virtue of hour our function is defined, by USPAP Ethics and Competency Rules, has the right to believe our reports are truthful, accurate, correct. They have no reason to expect the report might be biased to favor the client who paid the fee, the cause of the client, the approval of a loan a predetermined value, etc. In fact we certify that we have not done any of those things, certify that we functioned in an unbiased and objective manner.
This week alone, in my office we have seen situations where the accuracy and veracity of the appraisal was on the face of the document seriously questionable. The issues ranged from:
- reporting a property to be in a City that it was not in,
- to misrepresenting the Market Trend as Stable when it has been Declining for 10+months,
- to misreporting the Zoning where the house was on commercial and the report stated residential,
- to misrepresenting the value by improper Scope of Work,
- to inappropriate market data selection,
- to lack of data verification and meaningful analysis.
Appraisal Fraud in its simplest definition is an inflated or misleading report. It is either done intentionally, out of incompetency or is a forgery.
Click below for the REST of the story . .
Recent Comments